Questions

What was pitched beside what is binding; the questions the record holds open; and the public documents that would close them — which anyone can request.

Pitched vs. binding

For each decision: what was pitched beside what is actually enforceable. Where no gap is documented, this page says so.

American Magic (#315)

Jobs

◌ Pitched

170 jobs at ~$105,000 — the 2023 application and Triumph figure.

● Binding / drafted

Lease: 120 'New Jobs', wide counting net (affiliates + undefined 'partners'), gated $1.5–3M sole-and-exclusive remedy. Triumph instruments separately carry 170 @ ≥$105k with a $50k/job clawback (agreement not yet archived).

Wages

◌ Pitched

~$105,000 average (Triumph figure).

● Binding / drafted

The lease contains NO wage provision of any kind (v1.2 correction: the 115% floor is a Triumph-instrument term, not the lease's).

Scope

◌ Pitched

America's Cup boat-building headquarters (recitals + every public description).

● Binding / drafted

Permitted use licenses 'other boats and boat products' and 'other products and services that use the Tenant's capabilities' — permissions wider than the description (P2's mirror).

Birdon / Project Maeve (#367) — pre-execution: the 'binding' column is drafted, not in force

Jobs

◌ Pitched

2,000 'direct jobs at the Port' over 5 years.

● Binding / drafted

≥2,000 Net New Jobs — FTEs anywhere in eight counties, subcontractors included, by 2035; the Mayor on record: 'not all two thousand will be on port.' (Proposed; nothing executed.)

Wages

◌ Pitched

$80,000 = 140% of county average — and $81,200 = 145% in the same filing (internal inconsistency preserved).

● Binding / drafted

Floor of 115% of county average (≈$64k) in the draft instruments.

Capex / share

◌ Pitched

$105M construction narrative → Triumph share 72.4%.

● Binding / drafted

Term-sheet Exhibit B folds site prep into $130M construction → Triumph share 58.46% ('to ensure Triumph is not over-exposed to completion risk').

ST Titan / Project Titan (#120)

Jobs

◌ Pitched

'Nearly 2,000 direct jobs' in the targeted aviation/aerospace industry — plus 3,400 indirect/induced per the Haas Center study.

● Binding / drafted

1,325 jobs subject to clawback — 66% of the headline. The rest of the '~2,000' is non-binding by the City's own decomposition: 216 ESTIMATED industry jobs + 400 Hangar 1 jobs expressly 'not a part of Project Titan' (C-STE-B4). Tested as best-7-of-10 averages on a clock that starts five years after Hangar 4's completion.

Wages

◌ Pitched

'Average wage of nearly $50,000' — promotional material only; no instrument carries it. The board-facing memo committed 'at least $45,394' (Feb 2019).

● Binding / drafted

$44,461 average annual wage, excluding benefits, each year (PA §2(a)(2)) — an AVERAGE, not a minimum, and the binding number reverted to the LOWER figure at execution: $44,461 (term sheets, Oct 2018) → $45,394 (memo, Feb 2019) → $44,461 (executed PA, Mar 2019).

IHMC Healthspan Center (#233)

Metrics

◌ Pitched

2020: ~18 new FTE, ≥$20M research proposals submitted, 45 businesses mentored.

● Binding / drafted

Today: expend ≥$58.5M in research grants by 2036 (an input metric); whether the original jobs metrics were achieved is unresolved, and PM#2's text is not in our documents.

UWF WAVE (#330)

No promise-vs-binding gap is documented for WAVE: the proposal's ask ($3,315,600) and metrics (175 certificates) carried into the executed term sheet unchanged. The record's open items here are of a different kind — the definitive GAA is absent and outcomes are too early. S-18 S-19

HPMCE Dock Complex (Bid 26-029)

No promise-vs-binding gap is documented: this is a construction award, not a jobs deal — the bid amount, contract amount, and completion terms match across the memo and contract. The record's preserved anomalies here are numeric inconsistencies inside the official documents themselves, not a pitch-to-instrument gap. S-16 S-17

Monitored questions

Each question is held open with dated triggers, not concluded. Canonical: record/questions.yaml — Q-IDs are permanent; questions close only when the documents that would close them surface. These are questions, never findings; no motive is imputed to anyone.

◈ Q-01 · monitored

Is “American Magic Services” legally BMQRA — and who occupies the premises?

The occupancy/entity axis (Run 06 §9, trigger T3 fired 2026-08-09, split resolution): the lease's use rights run to the Tenant (BMQRA). If AMS — or any SailGP entity — is a distinct legal person occupying or using the premises, Article 18 requires written City consent or a 10-day affiliate notice, and §16.01(c) makes noncompliance a top-tier Event of Default. No consent, notice, or amendment is in the public record; none has yet been requested. The controlling fact (AMS's exact legal form) is shared with Q-04.

Origin: record/decisions/american-magic-315/american-magic-extraction-run-06.md §9 · record/entities/american-magic-bmqra-entity-page.md §7 · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • T3a — Ch.119 → City/Port: Art. 18 consents, affiliate-assignment notices, sublease approvals, estoppels, lease amendments 2024→present (wanted W-05)
  • T3b — Ch.119 → §15.01 Hazardous Substances lists (wanted W-04)
  • T3c — Ch.119 → DBO certification + §3.05 berth arrangements + deposit receipt (wanted W-03/W-06/W-07)
  • T3d — Sept 2026 SailGP base opening: identify the contracting entity
Would close it as benign:
  • AMS confirmed as a BMQRA d/b/a (via Q-04's T1/T2 channels) — all activity is Tenant activity; this axis closes
  • Art. 18 consent/notice documents surface via T3a — compliance on the record; closes
Would escalate it:
  • A distinct AMS/SailGP entity in occupancy with no Art. 18 paper trail — a specific, documentable lease-compliance gap (a fact pattern, not an allegation of intent)
◈ Q-02 · monitored

Who stands behind the $76M — the Project Maeve America ↔ Birdon lineage?

The binding record names "Project Maeve America, Inc., a Delaware corporation" as the Birdon/#367 contracting entity; the narrative record (the Port's own FY2025 AFR) names "Birdon America Inc." No document connects them and none contains a parent guaranty, so collectability of the proposed $76M clawback depends on an undocumented lineage. Entities deliberately not merged. [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-011 — Birdon monitoring addendum 03 §4 / C-MAEV-new-6:] Both 2026-08-12 announcement-wave releases name "BIRDON AMERICA INC." as lessee/operator, while the Triumph clawback obligor of record remains Project Maeve America, Inc. (Delaware). Which entity signs the GAA? The ground lease? Guaranty from Birdon Pty Ltd? — unchanged question, now with the City publicly naming the OTHER entity. Escalating pattern: the closer to execution, the more consistently the public materials name Birdon America Inc. while the Delaware obligor sits in the Triumph paper. GAA signature page will resolve; capture on arrival.

Origin: record/decisions/birdon-367/birdon-project-maeve-extraction-run-02.md §2 · record/decisions/birdon-367/birdon-project-maeve-monitoring-addendum-03.md §4 (dated append 2026-08-13) · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • The executed GAA (~Sept 2026 earliest, per addendum 03's agenda check) — obligor + any guaranty; signature page resolves the naming
  • The 25-year lease and its guaranty/backing provisions
  • Direct SunBiz / Delaware registry entity + officer searches
  • Addendum 03 §5 checklist axis W-7 (which legal entity signs the guaranty; parent guaranty?) — the Titan-precedent watch item
◈ Q-03 · monitored

Is 115% the standard wage floor across Triumph jobs deals?

The same enforceable wage floor — 115% of county average, against advertised pitch wages of 140–145% — appears in the Birdon draft instruments, and the prior record carries it on the Triumph side of the American Magic deal. One more extracted Triumph jobs contract would show whether 115% is a portfolio-wide default. (v1.2 correction applies: the AM lease itself contains no wage term; the floor is a Triumph-instrument term.) [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-011:] The revisit trigger FIRED — ST Engineering #120's wage clause is now extracted (ST Titan Run 02): a FLAT $44,461 average-annual floor (PA §2(a)(2), 2019), not expressed as a percentage of a county average; sequence $44,461 (term sheets, Oct 2018) → $45,394 (memo, Feb 2019) → $44,461 (executed PA, Mar 2019) (C-STE-B3). So the third data point does NOT carry the 115% form; whether $44,461 related to any prevailing-wage benchmark in 2018–19 is undetermined. The question narrows rather than closes: is 115% the Triumph default for the POST-2023 deals? See also Q-13 (the Titan wage question).

Origin: record/synthesis/portfolio-synthesis-v1.md P2 (+ v1.2 correction banner) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §2 (dated append 2026-08-13) · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • Extract the wage clause of any third Triumph jobs deal (e.g. ST Engineering #120) — FIRED 2026-08-13 (see dated append); next: a post-2023 fourth deal, or the Birdon GAA's executed wage clause
◈ Q-04 · monitored

Does defense-manufacturing revenue flow through the 501(c)(3)?

Whether Saildrone/defense revenue runs inside BMQRA (a private foundation filing 990-PF) or through a not-yet-found taxable entity. Undetermined and plausibly too early — the deal post-dates the latest IRS filing, and a nonprofit may lawfully run unrelated business inside the exempt entity and pay 990-T tax. Not a finding; not an allegation. Shares its controlling fact (AMS legal form) with Q-01.

Origin: record/decisions/american-magic-315/american-magic-extraction-run-05.md addendum (monitored open question) · record/entities/american-magic-bmqra-entity-page.md §7
Revisit triggers:
  • T1 — ~2027: BMQRA's FY2026 Form 990/990-PF (Schedule R related orgs; any Form 990-T)
  • T2 — ~2026-11 → 2027-01: re-run FL/DE/MN portal entity + DBA searches
Would close it as benign:
  • A for-profit AMS entity appears in DE/FL/MN registries
  • The FY2026 return shows a related for-profit (Schedule R) or unrelated business income (990-T)
Would escalate it:
  • Durable, sizable commercial/defense revenue inside the 501(c)(3) with no 990-T and no subsidiary — especially any insider-benefiting transactions (IRC §4943 / §4941 / exemption questions)
◈ Q-05 · monitored

BMQRA: private foundation (990-PF) or “public charity”?

IRS filings classify BMQRA as a private foundation (990-PF, through Feb-2026); the "American Magic Foundation" page claims a "registered 501(c)(3) public charity." Plausible readings: loose marketing language, or public-support-building via the "250 for 250" campaign toward reclassification (inference, not asserted). Unresolved.

Origin: record/entities/american-magic-bmqra-entity-page.md §7 · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • Future IRS filings (form type change 990-PF → 990) or an IRS determination-letter update
◈ Q-06 · monitored

The federal-demand keystones: the order books behind 2,000 jobs and 5 wings/yr

Birdon's 2,000 jobs rest on Coast Guard/Navy shipbuilding volume the Company must win and retain; AMS's "5 wings/yr" implies a Spectre order book no public document shows. Neither Triumph nor the City controls either. First evidence arrived negative on the AMS side: Saildrone lost the Navy MUSV selection (~June 2026) and sued in the Court of Federal Claims — held open; a bid protest can succeed, and wing demand rides on ASW/endurance customers rather than the MUSV variant.

Origin: record/decisions/birdon-367/birdon-project-maeve-extraction-run-01.md §6 (keystone assumption) · record/entities/american-magic-bmqra-entity-page.md §7–8 · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • The Saildrone bid-protest outcome in the Court of Federal Claims
  • Any USCG WCC / Navy shipbuilding award or volume commitment naming Birdon's Pensacola facility
◈ Q-07 · monitored

Where does the pending $14M Florida Commerce request sit in Birdon's match?

The application shows a $14M Florida Commerce request; the term sheet's Exhibit B shows a $22.28M City match labeled "EDA + JGGF + other grants." Whether the $14M sits inside that figure is unresolved in the papers (JGGF is a Commerce program). [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-011 — Birdon monitoring addendum 03 §4 / C-MAEV-new-2:] The June 2026 stack projected "$14 million" from the Florida Job Growth Fund; the award presented 2026-08-12 is $9M. Gap = $5M: second tranche pending, scope trimmed, or projection revised — UNKNOWN. This partially resolves the "where" (the request sits in the JGGF channel), and opens the "why $9M." Monitor.

Origin: record/decisions/birdon-367/birdon-project-maeve-extraction-run-01.md (open questions; reconciliation table) · record/decisions/birdon-367/birdon-project-maeve-monitoring-addendum-03.md §2/§4 (dated append 2026-08-13) · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • The executed GAA's final budget exhibit; any FL Commerce award notice
  • The $5M gap: any second JGGF tranche, scope revision, or restated stack (addendum 03 C-MAEV-new-2)
◈ Q-08 · monitored

IHMC #233: the missing metric text and the 3.3× growth

The Fifth Amendment amends Performance Metric #1 and implies a PM#2 whose text is not in our documents — an obligation whose content is unknown. Also open: what drove the grant's 3.3× growth across five amendments, and whether the original ~18-FTE job metrics were achieved before being superseded.

Origin: record/decisions/ihmc-233/ihmc-233-extraction-run-01.md (resolved-questions log, STILL OPEN) · record/entities/entities-index.md watchlist
Revisit triggers:
  • The full current GAA conformed text (PM#2+); amendment staff memos; annual Oct-31 reports
◈ Q-09 · monitored

Which “American Magic” entity acquired the ROCKWOOL Racing SailGP team?

Unresolved — and the un-resolvability is the finding (Run 07 §0): across every source the named acquirer is Doug DeVos personally ("sports investor and American Magic Co-Founder"), while ownership/operation is attributed to the brand ("American Magic will own and operate the team"). No source names a legal entity on either side of a $60M+ transaction with named counsel (Miller Johnson) and a named co-investor (IKON Capital). Three candidate readings held open, none adopted: (a) a DeVos-controlled for-profit vehicle under the brand (most plausible — equity co-investment implies a structure a 501(c)(3) would not ordinarily issue); (b) DeVos personally holding title; (c) BMQRA itself (least plausible, most consequential — IRC §4943/§4944 questions would follow). Registered at WO-009 integration: this question predates the questions registry. Shares the Axis-2 fact pattern with Q-01 (premises occupancy) and Q-04 (defense-revenue flow) — common officers (Cazer, Hutchinson) span the "separate entity" boundary.

Origin: record/decisions/american-magic-315/american-magic-extraction-run-07.md §0
Revisit triggers:
  • T2 registry sweep extended per Run 07 §4: add MI (Miller Johnson / Continuum nexus) and the Danish CVR register to FL/DE/MN/NY
  • T1 (BMQRA FY2026 990, ~2027): read for related-party facility-access transactions, not only Schedule R / 990-T
  • The acquiring entity's post-close registrations + any SailGP league documentation naming the purchaser (wanted W-10)
  • Any facility-access/license/services agreement naming the team or its owner (wanted W-09; Art. 18 channel T3a)
◈ Q-10 · monitored

Titan's job data is already a public record — has anyone asked for it?

(QC-A′, superseding Run 01's QC-A as top target.) GAA §7.3, final sentence: all Back-up Data and §8.4 performance metrics "shall be deemed 'public records' under Section 119.011." Back-up Data (PA §2(m)) = payroll records, employment reporting forms, quarterly RT-6 returns, audited financials — deliverable to Triumph on 10 days' request. The verified job counts Run 01 hoped the mayor's 2024 audits might produce ALREADY EXIST as contractually-designated public records held by Triumph — a Ch.119 request to TRIUMPH for #120 Back-up Data and performance reporting is the highest-value request in the portfolio, because the entitlement is written into the instrument itself. Also still open (Run 01 QC-A, unchanged): did the 2024 mayor-announced audit regime (third-party recruitment review, quarterly audits, residency verification) produce anything? No output located; commissioned? delivered? public? → Ch.119 to the City for the review contract and all audit deliverables (wanted W-18).

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-01.md §7 (QC-A) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §0.5 + §5 (QC-A′)
Revisit triggers:
  • Ch.119 → Triumph: all §8.4 / PA §2(m) Back-up Data, RT-6 filings, performance reports, and compliance correspondence for #120 (expressly public records per GAA §7.3)
  • Ch.119 → City: the 2024 third-party recruitment review + quarterly audit deliverables + residency-verification methodology (W-18)
Would close it as benign:
  • The audits exist and are produced — the record gains verified job counts no other decision has
Would escalate it:
  • The announced accountability regime produced no output — the announced regime is itself the finding (recorded neutrally)
◈ Q-11 · monitored

Has GAA #120 been amended — and does 1,325 still bind against a smaller Hangar 4?

(QC-B, elevated by Run 02 to the central Titan question.) Has GAA #120 / the Performance Agreement been amended — for the H4 downsizing, the schedule, or job definitions? (Triumph agendas show amendment practice is routine.) Run 02 sharpens the stakes: GAA §3.1 says design changes shall not relieve the metrics ("MRO Lessee's ability to satisfy the performance metrics … shall not be materially adversely affected"), so the 2025 H4 downsize does NOT automatically reduce the 1,325 — absent an amendment, VT owes 1,325 against a smaller campus, while the city's own framing concedes the smaller H4 "may come with job reduction." Whether an amendment exists is unknown. Founder will supply the amendments (all five) via Run 03 (wanted W-14). [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-013 — ST Titan Run 03 §5, verbatim:] RESOLVED AS TO TEXT: 1,325 restated in GAA §5.3 as amended 2026-02-03, with a new substantial-progress suspension lever [S-57 §5]; no instrument amends the PA, the tiers, or the $44,461 floor; the City's 2025 "may come with job reduction" acknowledgment (Run 01) never entered any instrument. REMAINS OPEN AS TO EFFECT: the H4-DBO anchor means the extensions deferred the test years without touching the jobs text; and whether 1,325 is achievable against the downsized campus is an outcome question (status: too_early), not a text question. [QC-B — this question's run-level candidate designation — RESOLVED, same append: five amendments exist and are now extracted; none adjusts the metric.]

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-01.md §7 (QC-B) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §4 (R2-4) + §5 · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §5 (dated append 2026-08-13)
Revisit triggers:
  • GAA #120 amendments — founder to supply via Run 03 (W-14) — FIRED 2026-08-13: all five supplied and extracted (S-53–S-57); see dated append
  • Any Triumph agenda item touching #120
  • The jobs test's earliest start now tracks H4 DBO ~2027–28 (S-52); Tier 1 ramp ~2032–33 (Run 03 §4 / O-STE-01 append)
◈ Q-12 · monitored

Which legal entity carries the Pensacola obligations — and what counts as one of the 1,325?

(QC-C.) Which legal entity carries the Pensacola obligations (VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc. — an Alabama corporation, n/k/a "ST Engineering – Pensacola Aerospace"? STENA? parent guaranty?), and what do the GAA's job DEFINITIONS say about residency, transfers, and visa-status workers? The Chilean episode makes the definition load-bearing: 1,325 of WHAT counts? Run 02 partially resolves the definitional level: "Project Jobs" = net new, private-sector, FTE (2,080 man-hours/yr), in Escambia County, per §288.106(2)(i) F.S.; NO intra-Florida transfers count — but Alabama is not Florida, so jobs moved from Mobile are countable (H-1 resolved at the definitional level). Still open: the entity question itself — PA §4.2 permits assignment to a merging entity or affiliate on prompt written notice, so the Jan-2026 rename should have generated an assignment/merger notice IF any entity change occurred (wanted W-16).

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-01.md §7 (QC-C) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §0.4 + §2 (C-STE-0030)
Revisit triggers:
  • PA §4.2 assignment/merger notices re: the 2026 rename (W-16)
  • Alabama/Florida registry checks on VT MAE n/k/a ST Engineering – Pensacola Aerospace
  • Any Run-03 evidence of entity (vs pure d/b/a) change
◈ Q-13 · monitored

Titan's wage floor: $44,461 average — measured how, and against what?

(QC-D, as revised by Run 02's finding.) A wage floor EXISTS: PA §2(a)(2) requires the average annual wage of Project Jobs ≥ $44,461 excl. benefits, every year, and wage compliance is required for jobs to count as "maintained." Open remainder: the floor is an AVERAGE, not a minimum — against what baseline is the promotional "nearly $50,000 average" measured, and how does $44,461 relate (if at all) to the 115% prevailing-wage form Triumph's post-2023 deals carry (Q-03)? The three-figure sequence is preserved: $44,461 (term sheets, Oct 2018) → $45,394 (memo, Feb 2019) → $44,461 (executed PA, Mar 2019) — the binding number reverted to the LOWER figure at execution (C-STE-B3).

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-01.md §7 (QC-D) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §0.3 · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-run-02-addendum-b-feb-2019-memo.md (C-STE-B3)
Revisit triggers:
  • Ch.119 Back-up Data (Q-10) — actual average wages reported to Triumph
  • Any amendment touching the wage term (Q-11 / W-14)
◈ Q-14 · monitored

The Aerospace Academy: MOU executed? 50 locals/yr performed? A separate Triumph application?

(QC-E.) PA §4.11–4.12: Triumph + VT jointly fund an Aerospace Academy MOU — local-education partnerships, Workforce Escarosa pipeline, veteran track; training for UP TO 50 LOCAL RESIDENT candidates annually for 5 years. Was the MOU executed? Did the Academy run? (2021 press mentions ST "exploring" an Aviation Training Academy of 150 grads/yr — a THIRD number distinct from the binding 50/yr; promise-vs-binding again.) Plus Addendum B's separate-application check (C-STE-B10): the memo frames an "Aerospace Airman Academy" as "a separate project from Project Titan" eligible to apply for Triumph funding — did a separate academy application ever appear in Triumph's award list? Check at Run 03 / registry sweep.

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §2 (O-STE-04) + §5 (QC-E) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-run-02-addendum-b-feb-2019-memo.md (C-STE-B10)
Revisit triggers:
  • The Aerospace Academy MOU + annual outcomes (executed? performed?)
  • Triumph award-list sweep for any separate academy application (Run 03)
● Q-15 · resolved

The completion deadline passed April 2025 — where is the extension paper?

(QC-F.) GAA §5.1: the City "agrees to complete Project Titan within six (6) years after the Effective Date" → April 29, 2025, with day-for-day force-majeure extension (the definition expressly includes "epidemics" — COVID squarely qualifies). Titan is NOT complete (H3 due 2H2026; H4 contracted 4/2025). Consequence if missed: Triumph's obligation to make FUTURE disbursements expires unless a written extension was requested and granted BEFORE expiration. Either force majeure carried the date, or an extension letter exists, or post-4/2025 disbursements need a basis. NOT a breach finding — a PAPER-TRAIL finding: the extension / force-majeure documentation must exist; locate it (wanted W-15). [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-013 — ST Titan Run 03 §5, verbatim:] RESOLVED, PREMISE CORRECTED: §5.1 was extended by the Third Amendment (eff. 2023-08-30) to 2026-12-31 — twenty months before the original 2025-04-29 date — and by the Fifth Amendment (eff. 2026-02-03) to 2028-12-31 [S-55 §4; S-57 §3]. The deadline never lapsed uncured; Run 02 §0.6 and MCv4 described the unamended instrument (correction R3-1). The lapse in the chain was the §3.2 D/B EXECUTION deadline, which tripped 2024-06-30 and was retroactively reinstated by the Fourth Amendment (eff. 2024-06-28) [S-56 §2]. "What was given in exchange" for the 2028 extension: nothing from the performer; the Fifth Amendment pairs the extension with a City-side control regime (C-STE-0056–0063). STATUS: closed as asked; successor questions Q-16/Q-17 opened. [QC-F — this question's run-level candidate designation — SUPERSEDED by this resolution, same subject.]

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-02.md §0.6 + §5 (QC-F) · record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §0.1 + §5 (dated append 2026-08-13)
Revisit triggers:
  • §5.1 extension request/grant or force-majeure notices covering April 29, 2025 → (W-15) — RESOLVED 2026-08-13: the extension instruments are the Third and Fifth Amendments themselves (S-55/S-57); W-15 marked obtained
  • Triumph disbursement records post-April-2025 (their stated basis) — moot as posed; disbursement basis now runs through the amended §4.1 (S-55) and the §4.3 regime (S-57)
◈ Q-16 · monitored

The 2020 Extension Agreement — an amendment-class instrument nobody has

(QC-R03-1, Run 03 §5 verbatim.) The Extension Agreement approved by Triumph 2020-06-19 (recited from the Third Amendment onward; not among the published amendments): what did it extend, and why does it first appear in recitals three years later? → W-21. (Context, C-STE-0044: the First and Second Amendment recitals omit it; the Third, Fourth, and Fifth all enumerate it as amendment (i) in the chain.)

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §2.3 (C-STE-0044) + §5
Revisit triggers:
  • W-21 — the instrument itself (custodian: Triumph / City Clerk); priority high
  • Any Triumph board minutes of 2020-06-19 naming what was extended
◈ Q-17 · monitored

The Exhibit C reset: which reading — and what happened to the ≈$66.32M?

(QC-R03-2, Run 03 §5 verbatim — the run's sharpest new question.) The Exhibit C reset (C-STE-0065): under which reading — and if (a), what happened to the ≈$66.32M shown expended through 2023? Did previously-reported Matching Funds fall out of countability under §4.3, and does the City's audited reporting reflect a restatement? Targets: City ACFR/airport fund; Triumph program-administrator correspondence (itself reachable via the §7.3 public-records designation). (The two readings, neither adopted — C-STE-0065: (a) restatement of COUNTABLE spend under the new §4.3 staleness rule; (b) a forward disbursement/timing schedule that abandoned the actuals-to-date format without saying so. The instrument does not say which.)

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §0.5 + §2.5 (C-STE-0065) + §5
Revisit triggers:
  • W-25 — City ACFR / airport-fund statements FY2023–FY2025 (restatement check)
  • Ch.119 → Triumph program-administrator correspondence for #120 (§7.3 public-records designation; QC-A′/Q-10 channel)
◈ Q-18 · monitored

The unexecuted consents: did VT ever sign the Fourth and Fifth Amendments?

(QC-R03-3, Run 03 §5 verbatim.) The unexecuted consents: do signed VT consents to the Fourth and Fifth Amendments exist outside the published "fully executed" copies? If not, what is the effect of amendments to which the PA obligor never consented — given the PA is unamended and §3.2/§5.1 changes materially alter the schedule its clocks reference? (Recorded as a document-status question, not a legal conclusion.) (Consent-degradation sequence, §2: pre-signed 77 days early (1st), undated (2nd, 3rd), entirely blank (4th, 5th) — stress-log item 19.)

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §2.4–2.5 (C-STE-0054/0067) + §5
Revisit triggers:
  • W-24 — signed VT consents to the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, if they exist (custodian: Triumph / City Clerk)
◈ Q-19 · monitored

“The Company” in amended §5.3 — is the defined term anchored?

(QC-R03-4, Run 03 §5 verbatim — minor.) "The Company" in amended §5.3: confirm the GAA defines it (presumably = MRO Lessee/VT); if undefined, drafting artifact worth a line in the record. (The clause is the new 1,325 substantial-progress suspension lever, C-STE-0061 — which is why the defined-term check matters at all.)

Origin: record/decisions/st-titan-120/st-titan-extraction-run-03.md §2.5 (C-STE-0061) + §5
Revisit triggers:
  • Defined-term sweep of the executed GAA (S-41) at the exhibit_c_lineage pass
● Q-20 · resolved

The rail-money controversy: was there a public fight? (resolved on arrival)

(QC-R04-1, Run 01 §5.) Locate the public record of the dispute the founder recalls over port rail funding. As posed by Run 01, the record carried NO controversy claim — only same-agenda allocation facts. [Resolution, same day — Addendum A §A.3, verbatim:] RESOLVED (this addendum): the controversy is sourced — proposal (full $5.8M), public backlash, failed 4–3 vote (2026-01-15), state/HUD lobbying, compromise split (2026-03), executed 2026-03-26. Residual: primary-source the vote (W-32). [Addendum B adds the pre-vote layer: PNJ 2026-01-14 broke the provenance the day before the vote (S-67), and preserves the full-$5.8M vs "at least $2.3M" proposal-amount dispute (C-PRR-0033) — also W-32's job.]

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-extraction-run-01.md §5 (QC-R04-1) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.3 (resolution, dated 2026-08-13) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-b.md §B.1 (C-PRR-0033)
Revisit triggers:
  • W-32 — the 2026-01-15 agenda item + minutes + video + the 2026-01-12 Agenda Conference record (adjudicates C-PRR-0033; verifies the vote roster inference)
◈ Q-21 · monitored

Whose rail? The rehabilitated track's service geography vs the cluster

(QC-R04-2, Run 01 §5, sharpened by Addendum A.) Which berths/tracks does the rehabilitated rail/road serve, and do they serve the maritime-defense cluster tenants (Warehouse 10 / AMS / the prospective Birdon berths) or the bulk-cargo operation (Pate Stevedores / GE Vernova / Timab, per Run 03)? The HS002 scope names Berth 2 (cathodic) and the asphalt/aggregate/ concrete/block supply chains — which cuts AGAINST assuming cluster service (C-PRR-0009). Sharpened on the record: Shep Coggin (Port Commercial Development & Seaport Security Manager), to council: "This has nothing to do with American Magic" (C-PRR-0026) — the denial names American Magic only; the berth/track geography question is unanswered and now also covers whether rail serves the proposed Birdon/shipbuilding footprint, since the rail money and the $76M pitch moved through the same weeks (C-PRR-0027). GATES the uncounted-stack pattern promotion (two documented instances, distinct mechanisms, held at candidate).

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-extraction-run-01.md §5 (QC-R04-2) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.2 (C-PRR-0026) + §A.3
Revisit triggers:
  • W-27 — Port berth/track map + tenant lease footprints (rail service geography)
◈ Q-22 · monitored

How does an industrial port project meet the LMI National Objective?

(QC-R04-3, Run 01 §5, engaged by Addendum A.) HS002 Attachment A claims the project "will meet Low- and Moderate-Income (LMI) National Objective" without stating HOW it qualifies (area benefit / job creation) (C-PRR-0010). Administration voices assert per-dollar LMI benefit ("Every single dollar ... had to be proven" — Reeves; the rail/road serves "businesses located in low- and moderate-income areas" — port officials, C-PRR-0025). Verification target: HUD/Commerce national-objective compliance documentation for HS002 (Ch.119 to City or Commerce).

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-extraction-run-01.md §5 (QC-R04-3) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.2 (C-PRR-0025)
Revisit triggers:
  • Ch.119 → City / Florida Commerce: HS002 national-objective documentation (area-benefit or job-creation basis)
◈ Q-23 · monitored

The $1,950,000 road-paving line is 'PENDING AMENDMENT' — what's next in the pipeline?

(QC-R04-4, Run 01 §5.) 26-402's projected-cost table carries a $1,950,000 road-paving line marked "PENDING AMENDMENT" — is a further HS002 amendment (or other instrument) in the pipeline beyond the +$2.3M? Per PNJ (C-PRR-0034), the $2.3M covers "additional activities, such as repaving the port roads," contingent on Commerce approving the reallocation — the relation between that approval and the pending- amendment flag is unresolved. Standing Council-agenda watch item, paired with the HS002 expenditure deadline 2027-03-31 (C-PRR-0007).

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-extraction-run-01.md §5 (QC-R04-4) + §7.5 · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-b.md §B.1 (C-PRR-0034)
Revisit triggers:
  • Council agendas: any further HS002 amendment / road-paving instrument (standing watch)
  • 2027-03-31 — the CDBG-DR expenditure deadline (twelve-month build from 2026-03-01 lands ~2027-02/03; little margin, no prediction)
● Q-24 · resolved

What was HS010's original award amount? (resolved on arrival, confirmation pending)

(QC-R04-5, Run 01 §5.) Did HS010 originally exceed $1,061,500 + $1,000,000 — what was the pre-shift award amount? The instrument set implies ≈$2.06M initial. [Resolution layer, same day — Addendum A §A.3, verbatim:] CANDIDATE ANSWER: HS010 original ≈ $5.8M (press). Confirm against the original instrument (W-28) — note 26-343's own text says the 2024 acceptance was "contract HS010" without stating the original amount; the omission is consistent with A.0/R-A2. [Addendum B refines the timeline: the City was AWARDED the $5.8M in 2023 (Rebuild Florida HRRP); the HS010 subrecipient agreement was entered 2024-05-24 — award vs contract are separate dated events (C-PRR-0028).]

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-extraction-run-01.md §5 (QC-R04-5) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.3 (candidate answer, dated) · record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-b.md §B.1 (C-PRR-0028)
Revisit triggers:
  • W-28 — the ORIGINAL HS002 (2024-02-02) and HS010 (2024-05-24) agreements (the HS010 original states the award amount)
◈ Q-25 · monitored

The ~$61.5K reconciliation residual in the March split

(QC-R04-6, Addendum A §A.3.) The reconciled compromise split (C-PRR-0023) — HS010-as-amended $1,061,500 + HS021 $1,000,000 + Escambia $1,500,000 + HS002 increase $2,300,000 = $5,861,500 — exceeds the reported $5.8M by ~$61.5K, unexplained (admin/spent-to-date candidate). Which line absorbs it, and does the original HS010/HS002 paper explain the difference?

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.2 (C-PRR-0023) + §A.3
Revisit triggers:
  • W-28 (original agreements) / W-33 (the Escambia $1.5M transfer instrument) — the residual should fall out of the executed amounts
◈ Q-26 · monitored

Does ANY March agenda document disclose the $2.3M's provenance?

(QC-R04-7, Addendum A §A.3.) 26-402 presents the +$2.3M as a routine CDBG-DR amendment with no mention of the housing award, the January 15 rejection, or the reallocation; 26-344 frames the $1M HRRP→VHBP shift as "time and staffing constraints" (R-A2 — the provenance-stripped paper finding). Before asserting the omission is COMPLETE, sweep the full 2026-03-26 packet + the supplemental budget resolution text (current basis: the five documents in hand + both articles). → W-34.

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-a.md §A.0 (R-A2) + §A.3
Revisit triggers:
  • W-34 — the full 2026-03-26 agenda packet incl. Supplemental Budget Resolution text
◈ Q-27 · monitored

Fricker Center and Hollice T. Williams Park — the roads not taken

(QC-R04-8, Addendum B §B.2.) The eligible already-approved reallocation destinations named to council were THREE — the Port project, Fricker Center rehabilitation, and the Hollice T. Williams Park project (C-PRR-0032); the administration's proposal selected the port. What was proposed to the other two instead, and did either receive any of the reallocation in the final structure? (The March split shows $0 to both; confirm nothing moved via other instruments.) Low priority; completes the choice-structure record. [Dated append 2026-08-13, WO-014 follow-up 3 — founder-supplied capture, S-69:] NARROWED AS TO FRICKER, not closed. The City's own 2026-05-13 release has the ≈$9.5M Fricker renovation proceeding on "nearly $9.5 million in grant funding AWARDED IN 2023 and some Local Option Sales Tax funds" — a funding base that pre-dates the January 2026 reallocation fight — with construction June 2026 → June 2027, inside the ≈$22M "Direction 25" parks program. No reallocation dollars appear, consistent with the March split's $0. Still open: (a) the release does not NAME the 2023 grant's source/program — whether it is itself a Hurricane-Sally CDBG-DR award (which would explain Fricker's presence on the January eligible list of "already-approved disaster-recovery projects") is an open check, not asserted; (b) the nothing-moved-via-other-instruments confirmation; (c) the Hollice T. Williams Park half entirely.

Origin: record/decisions/port-road-rail/port-road-rail-run-01-addendum-b.md §B.1 (C-PRR-0032) + §B.2 · registry/sources.yaml S-69 (dated append 2026-08-13)
Revisit triggers:
  • Council agendas / CivicClerk sweeps for Fricker Center and Hollice T. Williams Park funding actions, 2026→
  • The S-69 release's unnamed 2023 grant award: identify the instrument/program (the 'grant funding' hyperlink target; council acceptance action ~2023) — is it Sally CDBG-DR?

Documents wanted

Public records the record cites or needs but does not yet hold. Every item names its custodian and carries a ready-to-send request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Obtaining one of these is the single most useful thing a reader can do. Canonical: record/wanted.yaml.

W-01 · wanted

Full bid attachments to Contract Bid #26-029 (City of Pensacola ↔ R J Gorman, HPMCE Dock Complex landside): Addendum #1 (2026-03-20) and the embedded Tierra geotech reports (Phase I 2024-08-29; Phase II Design 2025-01-10, running header "HPMCE – American Magic – Phase II").

The archived S-16 copy is the 8-page base instrument only; the attachments are cited by record/decisions/american-magic-315/ (Run 05) and are NOT in the archived file — full bid attachments outstanding.

Custodian: City of Pensacola (procurement / City Clerk; CivicClerk portal) S-16

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola (procurement / City Clerk; CivicClerk portal)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Full bid attachments to Contract Bid #26-029 (City of Pensacola ↔ R J Gorman, HPMCE Dock Complex landside): Addendum #1 (2026-03-20) and the embedded Tierra geotech reports (Phase I 2024-08-29; Phase II Design 2025-01-10, running header "HPMCE – American Magic – Phase II").

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-02 · wanted

Fully executed conformed S-29 lease (effective date + signature dates) plus ALL amendments to date, including the §8.10 property-insurance election amendment and the self-operative Exclusive-Use-extension and Phase-2/Preferential-Use amendments the lease itself mandates "for the avoidance of doubt."

The archived S-29 copy is the council-approved FINAL with the effective date and signature dates blank (anomaly A-2); execution claims currently rest on the Run 03/04 record (lease dated 2024-02-19).

Custodian: City Clerk S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Fully executed conformed S-29 lease (effective date + signature dates) plus ALL amendments to date, including the §8.10 property-insurance election amendment and the self-operative Exclusive-Use-extension and Phase-2/Preferential-Use amendments the lease itself mandates "for the avoidance of doubt."

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-03 · wanted

Date of Beneficial Occupancy certification (issued by the Program Manager) plus the Certificate of Occupancy.

The DBO is load-bearing (Run 06 C-0097): it starts rent, the security deposit clock, and the 120-jobs deadline — which may run ~11 months earlier than the 2029-12-31 figure in prior discussion — and determines whether the §3.05 early-termination right ever arose.

Custodian: City of Pensacola S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Date of Beneficial Occupancy certification (issued by the Program Manager) plus the Certificate of Occupancy.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-04 · wanted

§15.01 Hazardous Substances lists for the leased premises: the initial pre-Rent-Commencement list plus the annual March updates (March 2025, March 2026), with stored quantities.

Evidences the actual manufacturing scope on the premises independent of press releases (Run 06 trigger T3b).

Custodian: Port Director / City Fire Department S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Port Director / City Fire Department
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    §15.01 Hazardous Substances lists for the leased premises: the initial pre-Rent-Commencement list plus the annual March updates (March 2025, March 2026), with stored quantities.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-05 · wanted

Any Article 18 consents, affiliate-assignment notices, sublease approvals, estoppels, or lease amendments concerning the Warehouse 10 / AMHPC premises, 2024 → present.

The occupancy/entity axis of monitored question T3 (Run 06 trigger T3a): if AMS or any SailGP entity is a distinct legal person occupying the premises, Article 18 requires written City consent or a 10-day affiliate notice, and §16.01(c) makes noncompliance a top-tier Event of Default.

Custodian: Port Director / City Clerk S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Port Director / City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Any Article 18 consents, affiliate-assignment notices, sublease approvals, estoppels, or lease amendments concerning the Warehouse 10 / AMHPC premises, 2024 → present.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-06 · wanted

§3.05 berth and/or Bay-access accommodation arrangement documents, plus any Vessel Berth Applications filed by the Tenant (§9.01).

O-AMAG-09: a likely-triggered, live CITY-side obligation (Phase 2 was not substantially complete by 2025-12-31) with forgone-revenue implications that no prior source surfaced.

Custodian: Port of Pensacola S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Port of Pensacola
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    §3.05 berth and/or Bay-access accommodation arrangement documents, plus any Vessel Berth Applications filed by the Tenant (§9.01).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-07 · wanted

Security Deposit receipt — $291,200 (one year's Base Rent), due within 5 days of the Date of Beneficial Occupancy (Article 7).

O-AMAG-10 is unverified: payment is not in the record.

Custodian: City Treasury S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Treasury
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Security Deposit receipt — $291,200 (one year's Base Rent), due within 5 days of the Date of Beneficial Occupancy (Article 7).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-08 · wanted

Florida Department of Commerce grant agreement (the $2M capex / DEO $3.9M instrument referenced in the lease's §5.02 and Exhibit C).

The one core #315 funding instrument still unextracted (O-AMAG-04, R-4); needed to reconcile the lease-time budget against the reported $20.8M facility cost.

Custodian: Florida Department of Commerce / City of Pensacola S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Florida Department of Commerce / City of Pensacola
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Florida Department of Commerce grant agreement (the $2M capex / DEO $3.9M instrument referenced in the lease's §5.02 and Exhibit C).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-09 · wanted

Any facility-access, license, or services agreement between BMQRA (or the City/Port) and either (i) SailGP (the league training base) or (ii) the ROCKWOOL Racing team / its owner.

Run 07 X-1/X-2: two distinct non-BMQRA-branded relationships to the publicly-built premises now exist in the public narrative with zero occupancy instruments on the public record; the insider-transaction escalate marker is structurally live (parties + asset identified; terms unknown; no finding made). Bears on Q-01 and Q-09.

Custodian: City Clerk / Port Director if the City is party or consented under Art. 18; otherwise private — obtainable only via the 990 related-party disclosures (T1) or voluntary disclosure S-35 S-39 S-29

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk / Port Director if the City is party or consented under Art. 18; otherwise private — obtainable only via the 990 related-party disclosures (T1) or voluntary disclosure
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Any facility-access, license, or services agreement between BMQRA (or the City/Port) and either (i) SailGP (the league training base) or (ii) the ROCKWOOL Racing team / its owner.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-10 · wanted

The acquiring entity's registration: post-close filings in MI/DE/FL, the Danish CVR record for the team entity, and any SailGP league documentation naming the purchaser.

Run 07 §0 / Q-09: no source names a legal entity on either side of the $60M+ acquisition; the registrations are the direct resolution channel.

Custodian: State registries (MI/DE/FL) / Danish CVR / SailGP S-35 S-39

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: State registries (MI/DE/FL) / Danish CVR / SailGP
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The acquiring entity's registration: post-close filings in MI/DE/FL, the Danish CVR record for the team entity, and any SailGP league documentation naming the purchaser.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-11 · wanted

The MRO Master ground lease (Titan occupancy instrument): term ≥30 years, required by GAA §3.4 to carry the clawback liability and to name Triumph Gulf Coast as third-party beneficiary with direct enforcement rights; due (with the Development Agreement) by 2019-07-01. Check figure from the Feb-2019 memo (C-STE-B6): rent "approximately $1 million per year," triple net.

The top Titan occupancy-instrument wanted item: the lease is where the clawback machinery, the Triumph third-party-beneficiary rights, and the ~$1M/yr rent figure either appear as drafted or don't. Run 01's W-cand-4, sharpened by Run 02 (C-STE-0024) and Addendum B.

Custodian: City Clerk / Pensacola International Airport S-41 S-44

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk / Pensacola International Airport
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The MRO Master ground lease (Titan occupancy instrument): term ≥30 years, required by GAA §3.4 to carry the clawback liability and to name Triumph Gulf Coast as third-party beneficiary with direct enforcement rights; due (with the Development Agreement) by 2019-07-01. Check figure from the Feb-2019 memo (C-STE-B6): rent "approximately $1 million per year," triple net.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-12 · wanted

The MRO Development Agreement (GAA §3.4 companion instrument to the MRO Lease; the Performance Agreement was required to be incorporated into both).

Completes the #120 instrument set; carries the construction-side obligations of the MRO Lessee. Run 02 §5 wanted addition.

Custodian: City Clerk S-41

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The MRO Development Agreement (GAA §3.4 companion instrument to the MRO Lease; the Performance Agreement was required to be incorporated into both).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-13 · wanted

The 2018-10-27 binding MOU between the City of Pensacola and ST to enter a Development Agreement, contingent on funding (per the Feb-2019 memo).

The earliest City↔ST instrument on record (C-STE-B5) — a real instrument predating the GAA and both term sheets' execution dates.

Custodian: City Clerk S-44

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The 2018-10-27 binding MOU between the City of Pensacola and ST to enter a Development Agreement, contingent on funding (per the Feb-2019 memo).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-14 · obtained

All amendments to GAA #120 / the MRO Performance Agreement — all five, per founder; to be supplied via Run 03.

Q-11: whether the 1,325 still binds against the downsized Hangar 4, and what happened to schedule and definitions, is unanswerable without the amendment set. (Run 01 W-cand-1's amendment component; the base GAA is extracted as S-41, file pending attachment.) [Dated note 2026-08-13, WO-013:] Obtained as to the GAA — all five amendments registered S-53–S-57 and extracted (Run 03). NO amendment to the MRO Performance Agreement exists anywhere in the retrieved record (Run 03 C-STE-0068); the PA-amendment half of this item is answered by documented absence, not by a document. The Extension Agreement recited in the chain is a SIXTH amendment-class instrument still missing → W-21.

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk (founder to supply via Run 03) S-41

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk (founder to supply via Run 03)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    All amendments to GAA #120 / the MRO Performance Agreement — all five, per founder; to be supplied via Run 03.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-15 · obtained

GAA §5.1 completion-deadline paper: any written extension request/grant or force-majeure notices covering April 29, 2025 onward.

Q-15: the six-year completion deadline passed with Titan incomplete; either force majeure carried the date, or an extension exists, or post-4/2025 disbursements need a stated basis. A document that must exist. (Run 02 §0.6 / QC-F.) [Dated note 2026-08-13, WO-013:] The document did exist — and the premise falls with it (correction R3-1): §5.1 was extended by the Third Amendment (eff. 2023-08-30, to 2026-12-31) twenty months BEFORE the original date, and again by the Fifth Amendment (eff. 2026-02-03, to 2028-12-31). No force-majeure carry or extension letter was needed; the deadline never lapsed uncured. Q-15 resolved; successor questions Q-16/Q-17.

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk S-41

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    GAA §5.1 completion-deadline paper: any written extension request/grant or force-majeure notices covering April 29, 2025 onward.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-16 · wanted

PA §4.2 assignment/merger notices from VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc. to Triumph concerning the January 2026 rename/restructure to "ST Engineering – Pensacola Aerospace."

Q-12: §4.2 permits assignment to a merging entity or affiliate meeting a net-worth test with prompt written notice — if any entity change (vs a pure d/b/a rename) occurred, a notice should exist. (Run 02 C-STE-0030.)

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast S-41

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    PA §4.2 assignment/merger notices from VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc. to Triumph concerning the January 2026 rename/restructure to "ST Engineering – Pensacola Aerospace."

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-17 · wanted

"The Haas Center study" — the economic-impact study behind the memo's 3,400 indirect/induced jobs, $600M/yr GDP, and $400M/yr personal-income claims.

C-STE-B4: the public jobs headline decomposes into 1,325 binding + three non-binding estimates; the study is the basis for the largest of them.

Custodian: UWF Haas Center / City of Pensacola S-44

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: UWF Haas Center / City of Pensacola
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    "The Haas Center study" — the economic-impact study behind the memo's 3,400 indirect/induced jobs, $600M/yr GDP, and $400M/yr personal-income claims.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-18 · wanted

The 2024 accountability instruments: the third-party local-recruitment review (scope + report), independent quarterly job-count audit reports 2024Q4 → present, and the residency-verification methodology announced by the Mayor 2024-09-09.

Q-10's city-side half (Run 01 QC-A / W-cand-2): no retrieved source confirms any audit was completed, published, or continued after Sept 2024 — the gap between the announced regime and any visible output is itself a finding, recorded neutrally.

Custodian: City of Pensacola (mayor's office / airport) S-40

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola (mayor's office / airport)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The 2024 accountability instruments: the third-party local-recruitment review (scope + report), independent quarterly job-count audit reports 2024Q4 → present, and the residency-verification methodology announced by the Mayor 2024-09-09.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-19 · wanted

Titan council packets: the Hangar 3 contract award (2024, Roy Anderson Corp., $83.5M), the Hangar 4 design-build award (2025-04-24, Wharton-Smith, $35.4M), and any Titan budget amendments.

Run 01 §8 (W-cand-5): the public-procurement layer of the campus; self-serve via CivicClerk.

Custodian: City of Pensacola (CivicClerk portal — self-serve) S-40

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola (CivicClerk portal — self-serve)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Titan council packets: the Hangar 3 contract award (2024, Roy Anderson Corp., $83.5M), the Hangar 4 design-build award (2025-04-24, Wharton-Smith, $35.4M), and any Titan budget amendments.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-20 · wanted

The Project Stallion funding stack (Hangar 1, 2016–2018) — the predecessor decision's instruments.

Run 01 §8 (W-cand-6): Stallion is a predecessor decision stub (Hayward era); its 400 jobs are expressly excluded from the 1,325 until Stallion exceeds 400, so its own stack needs extraction for the boundary to be auditable.

Custodian: City Clerk / Pensacola International Airport / FDOT S-40 S-41

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk / Pensacola International Airport / FDOT
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The Project Stallion funding stack (Hangar 1, 2016–2018) — the predecessor decision's instruments.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-21 · wanted

The Extension Agreement approved by Triumph on 2020-06-19 — the amendment-class instrument recited as amendment (i) in the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to GAA #120, but not among the five published amendments and not in the record.

Q-16: an unknown amendment-class instrument in the #120 chain — what did it extend, and why does it first appear in recitals three years later (First/Second Amendment recitals omit it)? (Run 03 C-STE-0044 / §5.)

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk S-55 S-56 S-57

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The Extension Agreement approved by Triumph on 2020-06-19 — the amendment-class instrument recited as amendment (i) in the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to GAA #120, but not among the five published amendments and not in the record.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-22 · wanted

The County-side instrument for the $15M → $11.8M Escambia County reduction (interlocal-agreement amendment or BOCC action, ~2022–23).

Run 03 C-STE-0049: the Third Amendment's Exhibit C shifts the local split — City $15M → $18.2M; Escambia $11.8M ← $15M — a $3.2M reallocation TO the City FROM the County inside an unchanged $30M local total; no County-side instrument in the record documents the reduction. (Ties to run-01 W-cand-7, the County contribution instrument.)

Custodian: Escambia County Clerk S-55

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Escambia County Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The County-side instrument for the $15M → $11.8M Escambia County reduction (interlocal-agreement amendment or BOCC action, ~2022–23).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-23 · wanted

City Council resolutions authorizing the Second–Fifth Amendments to GAA #120 (the First was Robinson-era; the Fifth's council authorization is not in hand).

Run 03 §9: the council-authorization layer of the amendment chain — completes the public-approval record for instruments that moved the completion deadline +44 months and created the City-side control regime.

Custodian: City of Pensacola (CivicClerk portal — self-serve) S-54 S-55 S-56 S-57

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola (CivicClerk portal — self-serve)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    City Council resolutions authorizing the Second–Fifth Amendments to GAA #120 (the First was Robinson-era; the Fifth's council authorization is not in hand).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-24 · wanted

Signed VT consents to the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to GAA #120, if they exist outside the published "fully executed" copies.

Q-18: both published copies carry ENTIRELY BLANK VT consent blocks (Run 03 C-STE-0054/0067) — two consecutive unexecuted consents from the PA obligor to amendments that materially alter the schedule the PA's clocks reference. A document-status question, not a legal conclusion.

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk S-56 S-57

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast / City Clerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Signed VT consents to the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to GAA #120, if they exist outside the published "fully executed" copies.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-25 · wanted

City of Pensacola ACFR / airport-fund financial statements, FY2023–FY2025.

Q-17 (the Exhibit C reset cross-check): the Third Amendment's exhibit showed ≈$66.32M expended through CY2023; the Fifth's same-titled exhibit shows zeroes for 2019–2023 and re-times all $210,125,000 into CY2024–2028. Whether the City's audited reporting reflects any restatement is the direct documentary test between the two readings (Run 03 C-STE-0065).

Custodian: City of Pensacola (finance) / Florida Auditor General S-55 S-57

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola (finance) / Florida Auditor General
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    City of Pensacola ACFR / airport-fund financial statements, FY2023–FY2025.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-26 · obtained

L-2 capture: the Port railway rehabilitation funding instruments (the disaster-recovery-shift lead).

Run 03 §7 raised this lead's priority: C-STE-0071/-0074 document one instance of disaster-recovery funds (FDOT Hurricane Sally grant G2711) expended primarily on cluster-serving infrastructure (Warehouse 10 — the American Magic facility) outside any announced Harbor-Bet funding stack; the rail rehab is the second possible instance of the same mechanism, still lead-status only. Uncounted-stack pattern held at CANDIDATE — one documented instance + one lead ≠ pattern. [Dated note 2026-08-13, WO-014:] L-2 final status: CONFIRMED AND DOCUMENTED (Port Road & Rail Run 01 + Addenda A/B — the new `port-road-rail` decision). The rail is its own $11.4M CDBG-DR award atop $2.37M FSTED; the +$2.3M increase IS reallocated Hurricane Sally HOUSING money (the surviving port share of the failed $5.8M full reallocation, R-A1). Residuals: Q-21 (whether the rail physically serves the cluster — gates the uncounted-stack promotion) and Q-22 (LMI-objective compliance). The mechanisms of the two documented instances are DISTINCT (G2711 expenditure vs HS002 reallocation) and are kept separate.

Custodian: City of Pensacola / Port of Pensacola / FDOT S-59

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City of Pensacola / Port of Pensacola / FDOT
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    L-2 capture: the Port railway rehabilitation funding instruments (the disaster-recovery-shift lead).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-27 · wanted

Port berth/track map + tenant lease footprints (the rehabilitated rail/road's service geography).

Q-21: whether the rail serves the maritime-defense cluster tenants (Warehouse 10 / AMS / prospective Birdon berths) or the bulk-cargo operation (Pate Stevedores / GE Vernova / Timab). Gates the uncounted-stack pattern promotion. (Run 01 W-R04-2.)

Custodian: Port of Pensacola / City GIS S-61

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Port of Pensacola / City GIS
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Port berth/track map + tenant lease footprints (the rehabilitated rail/road's service geography).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-28 · wanted

The ORIGINAL HS002 agreement (entered 2024-02-02) and ORIGINAL HS010 agreement (entered 2024-05-24) — only the Amendment Ones are in hand.

Q-24 (HS010's original award amount — press says ≈$5.8M; the instrument states it) and Q-25 (the ~$61.5K residual). Custodian packets: CivicClerk Dec-2023 / May-2024. (Run 01 W-R04-3.) [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-023:] PARTIALLY SATISFIED — the ORIGINAL HS010 agreement has been in the corpus as S-86 since WO-017 (2026-08-15), so this entry's "only the Amendment Ones are in hand" is no longer true on its face. Still outstanding: the ORIGINAL HS002 agreement (entered 2024-02-02). Recorded only; the watch is NOT closed — whether to split or re-scope this entry is a founder ruling. [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-024 — label correction:] the note above was made under the work order the founder issued as WO-020 Phase 2 (issued 2026-08-22, per WO-024); its "WO-023" label was an error at the time of writing. The original text stands as written.

Custodian: CivicClerk (2023-12-14 and 2024-05-09 council packets) S-61 S-63 S-86

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: CivicClerk (2023-12-14 and 2024-05-09 council packets)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The ORIGINAL HS002 agreement (entered 2024-02-02) and ORIGINAL HS010 agreement (entered 2024-05-24) — only the Amendment Ones are in hand.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-29 · obtained

The HS021 contract (Voluntary Home Buyout Program, $1,000,000) as executed.

Completes the March-2026 instrument set; 26-344 is the acceptance memo only. (Run 01 W-R04-4.) [Dated note 2026-08-13, WO-014 follow-up:] Obtained same day — the founder's follow-up set included the 57-pp HS021 Subrecipient Agreement (26-344's attachment), registered and hashed as S-68. Intake only: whether this published copy is Docusign-complete ("as executed") is not yet determined — extraction queued; cf. the unexecuted-as-published pattern on the two Commerce amendments (S-61/S-63).

Custodian: CivicClerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce S-64

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: CivicClerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The HS021 contract (Voluntary Home Buyout Program, $1,000,000) as executed.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-30 · wanted

Fully executed (Docusign-complete) copies of HS002 Amendment One and HS010 Amendment One.

Both published council-packet copies are unexecuted-as-published (blank signature blocks — S-61/S-63 anomalies; the backlog-item-19 execution- status class). (Run 01 W-R04-5.)

Custodian: City Clerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce S-61 S-63

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: City Clerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Fully executed (Docusign-complete) copies of HS002 Amendment One and HS010 Amendment One.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-31 · wanted

The FSTED G2838 ($1,524,565) and G2856 ($850,353) grant instruments.

The rail project's seaport co-funding layer — reconciled at high confidence to HS002 Attachment A's $2,374,917.98 "leverage" figure (C-PRR-0004) but not yet held as instruments. (Run 01 W-R04-6.)

Custodian: FSTED / FDOT / City of Pensacola S-60 S-61

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: FSTED / FDOT / City of Pensacola
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The FSTED G2838 ($1,524,565) and G2856 ($850,353) grant instruments.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-32 · wanted

⭐ The 2026-01-15 council agenda item (the full-$5.8M reallocation AS PRESENTED), meeting minutes, and video — PLUS the 2026-01-12 Council Agenda Conference recording/minutes (C-PRR-0035's distinct governance event).

The strongest primary artifact of the episode. Adjudicates dispute C-PRR-0033 (PNJ pre-vote "at least $2.3 million" vs WUWF post-vote full-$5.8M); verifies the 4–3 vote roster (yes: Moore, Broughton, Jones; no-votes INFERRED pending these minutes); captures the three-destination option framing as presented (C-PRR-0032). (Addendum A W-R04-7, sharpened by Addendum B.)

Custodian: CivicClerk S-65 S-66 S-67

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: CivicClerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    ⭐ The 2026-01-15 council agenda item (the full-$5.8M reallocation AS PRESENTED), meeting minutes, and video — PLUS the 2026-01-12 Council Agenda Conference recording/minutes (C-PRR-0035's distinct governance event).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-33 · wanted

The Escambia County instrument for the $1.5M tear-down/rebuild transfer (~6 rebuilds inside city limits).

The County piece of the March compromise (C-PRR-0023) — no City instrument in hand documents the transfer mechanics. (Addendum A W-R04-8; ties to Q-25.)

Custodian: Escambia County Clerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce S-66

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Escambia County Clerk / Florida Dept. of Commerce
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The Escambia County instrument for the $1.5M tear-down/rebuild transfer (~6 rebuilds inside city limits).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-34 · wanted

The full 2026-03-26 council agenda packet, including the Supplemental Budget Resolution text.

Q-26: whether ANY March agenda document discloses that the $2.3M derives from the reallocated housing award — the provenance-stripped- paper finding (R-A2) is currently based on the five documents in hand plus both articles; the sweep completes it. (Addendum A W-R04-9.)

Custodian: CivicClerk S-60 S-62 S-64

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: CivicClerk
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The full 2026-03-26 council agenda packet, including the Supplemental Budget Resolution text.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-35 · wanted

⭐ Escambia County's $9M HRRP award and program records — the comparator program awarded the SAME DAY as the City's $5.8M, for an identical county-resident program.

C-PRR-0029: the County stood up what the City could not, and later became the $1.5M tear-down/rebuild partner in the compromise — the natural control case for the City's stall; supports the page's fairness. (Addendum B W-R04-10.)

Custodian: Escambia County / Florida Dept. of Commerce S-67

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Escambia County / Florida Dept. of Commerce
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    ⭐ Escambia County's $9M HRRP award and program records — the comparator program awarded the SAME DAY as the City's $5.8M, for an identical county-resident program.

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-36 · watch

TECH PARK — Council/CRA agenda watch. Trigger terms: "Technology Park"; geotechnical / subsurface contract awards (any department).

Cadence: per agenda cycle. Basis: addendum 2026-08-13 §5.4(a). Status: watch only — no decision page; full scoping run fires post-launch OR the moment an instrument surfaces, whichever first. (W-p1, WO-015.)

Custodian: City of Pensacola / CRA (CivicClerk agendas)

W-37 · watch

TECH PARK — IHMC board minutes watch. IHMC is a state-affiliated not-for-profit research institute (Fla. Stat. 1004.447); board minutes are public records.

Trigger: any Technology Park / facility-buildout / Pensacola-campus-expansion item. Cadence: as posted. Basis: addendum §5.4(b). (W-p2, WO-015.)

Custodian: IHMC (board minutes — public records per Fla. Stat. 1004.447)

W-38 · watch

TECH PARK — Triumph pipeline watch. Trigger: any IHMC-anchored proposal, pre-application, or term sheet in Triumph agendas/minutes.

Cadence: monthly, rides the existing GAA #367 agenda scan. Basis: addendum §5.4(c). (W-p3, WO-015.)

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast (agendas / minutes)

W-39 · obtained

The EXECUTED Grant Award Agreement for UWF WAVE (#330), effective 2025-03-13, $3,315,600 — the definitive/binding instrument beyond the executed-nonbinding Term Sheet (S-18).

WAVE Run 01 "STILL OPEN" item and the site's monitored claim ("the definitive GAA for #330 is not in the record") both rest on this document's absence. [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-023:] the founder holds an executed copy — sha256 99c75f523e2e64598bab761f794187603a8186f5dc4a035e0f27ea370f785200, 3,030,890 bytes, 29 pp (founder-held capture; NOT intaked, NOT hashed against an archived copy, no S-ID). Until it passes two-hash intake under a separate work order, every non-binding/no-GAA statement in the record stands unchanged. [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-024 — label correction:] this entry and its dated note above were made under the work order the founder issued as WO-020 Phase 2 (issued 2026-08-22, per WO-024); the "WO-023" label was an error at the time of writing. The original text stands as written. [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-027:] OBTAINED — the document passed two-hash intake this session and is registered as S-90 (archive/2025/2025-03-13_ triumph_grant-award-agreement_330-uwf-wave.pdf). Three-way corroboration: the founder-held hash recorded above = the committed incoming/ copy (WO-026 Task 1c MATCH) = the archived copy. Effective Date on the instrument's own signature page: March 13, 2025 — matching this entry. Per this entry's own terms the non-binding/no-GAA statements in the record are NOT corrected by intake; correction is extraction, still pending a separate run. (Status flipped per the W-29 obtained precedent; this append is flagged in the WO-027 PR as adjacent to the order's enumerated tasks.)

Custodian: founder (capture in hand); Triumph Gulf Coast document portal S-18 S-90

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: founder (capture in hand); Triumph Gulf Coast document portal
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    The EXECUTED Grant Award Agreement for UWF WAVE (#330), effective 2025-03-13, $3,315,600 — the definitive/binding instrument beyond the executed-nonbinding Term Sheet (S-18).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.
W-40 · wanted

Triumph #342 — IHMC "National Center for Collaborative Autonomy" (NCCA): the proposal's document set, including its executed Grant Award Agreement, executed term sheet, and First Amendment (per Triumph's public per-project document page).

[Dated entry 2026-08-23, WO-023:] #342 is a qualifying Escambia County decision the corpus does not track — no decision page, no extraction. The work order carries it as $6,921,375, received 2024-08-28, with an executed GAA, an executed term sheet, and a First Amendment (founder observation of Triumph's project page — not yet captured). The corpus already references #342 three times without tracking it: Triumph's June-2026 portfolio table as extracted in AM Run 04 lists "#342 IHMC NCCA $6,720,805, 2024-10-30" (S-07); WAVE Run 01 records the edge "WAVE assists IHMC (#233/#342)" (S-19); and the ihmc-233 page carries the monitored line "a second IHMC grant — #342, NCCA, $6.7M — not yet extracted" (S-07). The work order's figure ($6,921,375 / 2024-08-28) and the S-07 table's figure ($6,720,805 / 2024-10-30) do not match — recorded as a contradiction to resolve at intake, not resolved here. [Dated note 2026-08-23, WO-024 — label correction:] this entry was made under the work order the founder issued as WO-020 Phase 2 (issued 2026-08-22, per WO-024); the "WO-023" label was an error at the time of writing. The original text stands as written.

Custodian: Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. (myfloridatriumph.com per-project document page) S-07

Copy-paste Ch.119 request
To: Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. (myfloridatriumph.com per-project document page)
Re: Public records request under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes

Pursuant to Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119,
Florida Statutes, I request copies of the following public records:

    Triumph #342 — IHMC "National Center for Collaborative Autonomy" (NCCA): the proposal's document set, including its executed Grant Award Agreement, executed term sheet, and First Amendment (per Triumph's public per-project document page).

If any portion of these records is claimed exempt, please cite the specific
statutory exemption and produce the remainder. Please advise of any fees
before fulfilling the request; electronic copies are preferred. Thank you.